..and why would accounts not be made public. If the monarchy did actually produce a net benefit, as some people seems to want to claim, why wouldn’t the monarchy want that information publicly available?And that from only the accounts made public.
Aye... there are some things like royal 'investments' in things like Shell and other dubious companies, which are all nicely kept in tax havens and never make it to the public accounts committee...and why would accounts not be made public. If the monarchy did actually produce a net benefit, as some people seems to want to claim, why wouldn’t the monarchy want that information publicly available?
Yes, the Panama Papers will only be the tip of the icebergAye... there are some things like royal 'investments' in things like Shell and other dubious companies, which are all nicely kept in tax havens and never make it to the public accounts committee.
The French were persistent rather than thorough. It took at least 3 attempts, in view of the bizarre tendency of their most senior elected officials to want to become unelected monarchs.The trouble is that Cromwell and his mates only chopped off Charlie's head. They should have done a bit of ethnic cleansing with the aristocracy en masse. The French were much more thorough.
That's hardly uncommon.the bizarre tendency of their most senior elected officials to want to become unelected monarchs.
Now you mention it, yes.That's hardly uncommon.
Typical middle class liberals, even in Revolutionary France, one sniff of power and they think they’re royaltyThe French were persistent rather than thorough. It took at least 3 attempts, in view of the bizarre tendency of their most senior elected officials to want to become unelected monarchs.
The French were persistent rather than thorough. It took at least 3 attempts, in view of the bizarre tendency of their most senior elected officials to want to become unelected monarchs.
Ah yes. Well known for their lack of bias and impartiality.The campaign group Republic assert that the full annual cost of the British monarchy to be at least £350,000,000 a year
Just like Forbes then?Ah yes. Well known for their lack of bias and impartiality.
Must be right then.
It was the context of my post if you care to looknot that similar no.
Yes, a bit like some Roman emperors. Even De Gaulle came close, "La France, c'est moi!"