kendo
Prussian bot
SNP and Greens agree new power-sharing deal.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-scotland-politics-58272209
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-scotland-politics-58272209
SNP and Greens agree new power-sharing deal.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-scotland-politics-58272209
...and all the press coverage is negative, what a surprise!
the snp are not perfect, their record on education is poor
That'll be the Anas Sarwar who doesn't pay his employees a living wage and send his kids to private school...A deal that has yet to be ratified by both parties executives and of which no detail has been published.
Scottish Labour leader Anas Sarwar says the Greens need to "rediscover their principles" which is somewhat ironic.
Every nation has its problems, often structural and inherited from the past. Based on my limited information (our daughter has worked in both), NHS Scotland is in slightly better shape than NHS England.I've only just re-visited this thread so apologies for the late comment on the above quote. The SNP record on the NHS is nothing to write home about either and which city is with the worst drug related death problem in the whole of Europe.
That makes them fit to run the country now let alone in the event of independence?
I must be missing something.
Have they determined what the EC would require of an independent Scotland to gain entry yet?
Regards
Richard
Yes you seem to be missing the responses to your previous posts about the NHS in Scotland. There are significantly more GPs and hospital beds per capita in Scotland than in England, A&E waiting times are lower because less people attend A&E compared with England- possibly they can see a GP instead of relying on A&E. The overall differences are no doubt a consequence of how Scottish Government chooses to allocate its overall budget. £2,368 per head of population goes to the NHS in Scotland vs £,2,182 in England. You don’t have to pay prescription charges in Scotland either.I've only just re-visited this thread so apologies for the late comment on the above quote. The SNP record on the NHS is nothing to write home about either and which city is it with the worst drug related death problem in the whole of Europe.
That makes them fit to run the country now let alone in the event of independence?
I must be missing something.
Have they determined what the EC would require of an independent Scotland to gain entry yet?
Regards
Richard
The overall differences are no doubt a consequence of how Scottish Government chooses to allocate its overall budget. £2,368 per head of population goes to the NHS in Scotland vs £,2,182 in England
Well, it’s clear no voters in any of the remaining 27 EU states had a vote on Britain leaving the union. The vote on Scotland leaving the present union will be the same- the choice of voters like yourself within Scotland.
Just who ‘permits’ a referendum is open to legal examination but one thing is for sure- if a government in Westminster obstructs the democratic wishes of the majority of voters in Scotland to make that choice, then there will major constitutional problems. You can only stop people leaving for so long and I’d argue that trying to prevent them will only increase the independence vote.
Aiming to respect the wishes of the Scots if >60% of the population wish it is setting a high bar and how often do you conduct polls to determine this?
I know the SNP are a bit short on details on how they would manage the economy and I believe they currently envisage keeping the pound. Are they really content for the interest rate applied to their economy to be set by the Bank of England who are determining it based on the conditions in what remains of the UK and not explicitly Scotland. Odd.
You really can't see how? It's called a lesson learned. This is the most obvious lesson to be learned from 2016. The problems of the 2016 referendum result being so close for such a massive change should be obvious to all and should not be repeated.I'd have accepted the requirement for a 60%+ vote if the same were applied to Brexit. Given how slim the margin was Brexit though (and a margin that's probably eroded now anyway as you'd have to be a moron or one of those feeding at the trough to still support it), then I don't see how the Tories could really push for it for the Independence vote. Not that it'll stop them given they've no morals etc.
I disagree Brian.You really can't see how? It's called a lesson learned. This is the most obvious lesson to be learned from 2016. The problems of the 2016 referendum result being so close for such a massive change should be obvious to all and should not be repeated.
I will be amazed if the tories agree to a referendum without a need for a supermajority and I even have doubts the SNP would take Scotland out of the UK on a result similar to the 2016 referendum. A supermajority is obviously the way to go.