Why should these arseholes be given three chances to kill someone?
There are some pretty fundamental privacy, human rights and data protection issues around CCTV in the cab. Not by any means an obvious solution, and likely to be heavily disproportionate. More road police would help, but that was scaled back in favour of speed cameras. Many of us argued this was dumb, at the time. We were often derided as selfish speed freaks.
And successive Tory governments have cut police funding. Go figure.
The lap belt makes it difficult to masturbate whilst watching porn at 56mph?
I am lucky to work with a lot of young people (early 20s) and they argue their phone skills are so good that using them does not impair their driving; in the case of old duffers like me they quite agree it should be prohibited.I initially thought his sentence was a bit stiff but I imagine the prosecution had context- his multiple actions leading up to the crash and deliberately circumventing the seat belt alarm. Surprising it didn’t happen earlier given his attitude to road use.
Four years ago I had a young driver persistently less than one car length from my rear bumper for 2 miles through an urban area, head down both thumbs going on the phone. She must have had very good peripheral vision because every time I touched the brake, her head would come up and she would brake. Quite impressive.
Quite right, no decent person would want to be on the same side of the argument as Jimmy Saville.No seat belt and that crash looked quite severe.
I always knew it. No need to clunk click for every trip.
The alternative take is that driving standards in the young are so poor that any further impairment from phone use is not noticeable.I am lucky to work with a lot of young people (early 20s) and they argue their phone skills are so good that using them does not impair their driving; in the case of old duffers like me they quite agree it should be prohibited.
It looks as if his lorry was heavier and tougher than the van he hit so the impact on him was less severe.No seat belt and that crash looked quite severe.
I always knew it. No need to clunk click for every trip.
I don't like the way most cars have abandoned built in GPS
The faceful of windscreen glass alone looks pretty grim.It looks as if his lorry was heavier and tougher than the van he hit so the impact on him was less severe.
Cars are worldwide, the ICE tends to be fairly local.all that i have looked at recently seem to use built in GPS
I am lucky to work with a lot of young people (early 20s) and they argue their phone skills are so good that using them does not impair their driving; in the case of old duffers like me they quite agree it should be prohibited.
I initially thought his sentence was a bit stiff but I imagine the prosecution had context- his multiple actions leading up to the crash and deliberately circumventing the seat belt alarm. Surprising it didn’t happen earlier given his attitude to road use.
Four years ago I had a young driver persistently less than one car length from my rear bumper for 2 miles through an urban area, head down both thumbs going on the phone. She must have had very good peripheral vision because every time I touched the brake, her head would come up and she would brake. Quite impressive.