ff1d1l
pfm Member
Well, goes over to Labour at any rate
https://www.theguardian.com/politic...ts-to-labour-with-withering-attack-on-johnson
https://www.theguardian.com/politic...ts-to-labour-with-withering-attack-on-johnson
We were talking about just that in our household right after hearing the news. Consensus was that he might be the best game in town.Next Labour leader ?
And way past the time he should have pulled up Johnson for his contempt of parliamentary process.Takes a showman to recognise one. He was a breath of fresh air and also quite damaging at times. The current speaker is starting to get seriously irritated by the blond sociopath.
That crossed my mind too in a not totally serious sort of way. He'd have to get selected as a candidate and win a seat first of course, and while I can see that he would ginger things up a bit and appeal to many sensible middle of the road centrist pro EU people like me, I wonder what the Labour Party True Believers would make of him? He comes with a fair amount of old right-wing though now apparently discarded baggage as he readily admits. Be interesting to see what, if anything, he does now!Next Labour leader ?
As MP for Buckingham in 1997 he was opposing the New Labour politics of Blair, so the question has to be, is his defection down to a personal antipathy towards Boris Johnson, or a more political and ideological conversion?
He’s on Sky right nowIn fairness the Conservative Party of John Major in 1997 was entirely different to the popularist/nationalist hard-right Trump/UKIP clone of Johnson. Parties do not stay in one place on the map and the Tory party has moved a huge distance since the mass purge of moderates leading into the last election. His analysis is entirely correct, and I guess Starmer’s Labour exists pretty much exactly where Major’s Tories did in 97. One could easily argue he has stayed where he was and the parties have moved around him.
In fairness the Conservative Party of John Major in 1997 was entirely different to the popularist/nationalist hard-right Trump/UKIP clone of Johnson. Parties do not stay in one place on the map and the Tory party has moved a huge distance since the mass purge of moderates leading into the last election. His analysis is entirely correct, and I guess Starmer’s Labour exists pretty much exactly where Major’s Tories did in 97. One could easily argue he has stayed where he was and the parties have moved around him.
The tory party in 1997 was bad, but the current bunch is in an entirely different league.While the defection of Brecon is welcome and highlighting the "reactionary, populist, nationalistic and sometimes even xenophobic" nature of the Tory government in the news refreshing, the obvious question has to be that if he is against reactionary, populist, nationalistic and sometimes even xenophobic politics, why did he join the Tories in the first place?
As MP for Buckingham in 1997 he was opposing the New Labour politics of Blair, so the question has to be, is his defection down to a personal antipathy towards Boris Johnson, or a more political and ideological conversion?
Hopefully we’ll learn more in the next few days
He’s certainly an impressive speaker and likely responsible for containing one or two of the more anti constitutional excesses of Johnson which does him credit.
Which was kind of obvious.Bercow answered my question on Sky, he said that it was he that has moved and changed his political outlook over the years. He now describes himself as left of centre and for ‘equality, social justice and internationalism’.
Bloody woke.
I don't get the impression he GAF about a peerage...if he did he would have been a tory enabler, rather than a thorn in their side when speaker. I mean, that worked well for quite a few calling themselves labour, n'est ce pas?The horrible little person has only done it so he can be nominated for the peerage he has not received for being a Speaker, as has been the norm.