support your local record shop
Absolutely agree with you - and I do. The issue is that audiophile vinyl on American labels is almost impossible to get in the UK without paying ridiculous prices
support your local record shop
Absolutely agree with you - and I do. The issue is that audiophile vinyl on American labels is almost impossible to get in the UK without paying ridiculous prices
Shipping from the US can be stupidly expensive, and bear in mind the customs charge will be calculated on the items stated value plus shipping, then add the uk carriers cost for collecting the customs charge on behalf of HMRC.
Who ever said any of this crap had to make sense, or even financial sense?
The whole thing blows my mind. Why the US, UK, and Canada can't just ****in' get it together to send stuff among our three closely-tied nations is a mystery wrapped in a riddle smothered in secret sauce.
Never pay import duty
I bought a couple of small lab wash bottles for something like £2.50 delivered from Amazon. Then after ordering noticed delivery was 3 to 4 weeks and after checking found that these two bottles came all the way from China! It costs that much to send a recorded delivery letter in the UK!The whole thing blows my mind. Why the US, UK, and Canada can't just ****in' get it together to send stuff among our three closely-tied nations is a mystery wrapped in a riddle smothered in secret sauce. I sold a Naim Stageline to a PFM'er in the UK and the shipping from the US was $70 -- then, he got hit with customs duties! I was frankly embarrassed by the whole affair (and split the shipping cost).
On the other side of the coin, I recently bought a case of hot sauce from Osaka, Japan (much bigger, heavier box than the Stageline; also, I like hot sauce and this Japanese dude makes the best there is, IMO) and it arrived to me in NYC two days later at a shipping cost of $15. Fifteen bucks. Two days. From Japan. Japan!
Crazy no?
Crazy no?
It is, as Vinny notes, totally insane. Surely, the Chinese central gov't must be subsidizing shipping in some way?
It's based on a treaty from 1874 and the Universal Postal Union
Bizarrely, the US is effectively subsidising China. It's based on a treaty from 1874 and the Universal Postal Union (or something, I'm not an expert, but did stumble on a Youtube video about it). I never understood why Trump didn't deal with it.