paul darwin
pfm Member
Sue (we know who you are ), thanks for the unintentional "heads up" I meant to write 1.6mm but put 1.6% by accident (now corrected) but the 0.06" is still relevant.
Rega bashing is a popular pastime on SHF.
Rega products are great IMO and so is the customer service, on the whole, but I think they do rely too heavily on what, to the average customer, look like generous tolerances. It doesn’t really matter if 1.6mm sag makes no difference to the sound, I’m sure it’s visible and will take a big chunk off the resale value.
60 mil is US speak for 60 thousands of an inch or 0.06"I’m confused by the inconsistency in reporting the numbers on this thread. Early on, it was said that a discrepancy (avoiding ‘sag’ for Darwin’s benefit) of 1.6mm was acceptable according to Rega. Paul Darwin himself cites 1.6% or 60 thou’ (0.06”), which seems to have become 60 mill (about 2 1/2 inches) in some people’s heads. I reckon 60 thou’ is probably not too different to 1.6mm, but if you’ve said, or repeated, 60mill(imetres) and not realised how absurd it would be, maybe read it again?
The picture in the OP external forum thread seems doctored or photoshopped. In that thread, the complaining party admits that his sag is less than 60 mils and, therefore, doesn't qualify for Rega remediation. Yet the "photo" shows a good 0.125" or more sag - looks like a hammock.
This makes the whole issue very suspicious. Is the complaining party an actual Rega customer?
It’s 35 years old, it’s cost you about 75p per year at retail price. Maybe buy a newer model?I have a Planar 2, not presently in service, which suffers from a dished plinth. It's probably 35 years old or so, so long out of warranty. There's enough of a difference between the center bearing and the arm mount that I couldn't get the arm low enough, without spacers, for some cartridges. Thicker platters and mats helped somewhat.
I don't know how common it is, but warped Rega plinths are not an imaginary problem.
I think the Yank issue is not the same as the current issue; presumably, as has been suggested before, the new laminated foam plinth has a potential to flex under the right conditions. The old MDF plinths are probably 99.999% solid and unsaggy.It’s 35 years old, it’s cost you about 75p per year at retail price. Maybe buy a newer model?
I have a Planar 2, not presently in service, which suffers from a dished plinth.
Why would you say that? Without doubt the problems encountered with customers were real. Denying it doesn’t help.
Rega is a superb co. but have had problems wrt America, with the Apollo amongst other things through the years.
Hasn’t stopped me buying Apollo cdp, they’re a co. that will work with their customers to sort out problems.
The sagging is a real problem for them if it’s on a lot of the their decks, I hope they sort it out as they tend to do.
I have to say that I would not be happy with tolerances, either it is flat or not, 1-2mm over 500mm is a large deflection ime.
Roksan Radius anyone?
That forum has such a big membership that there will always be naysayers but I think Rega has a pretty good followership on the site. The issue here is the complaints are from actual owners, with pictures to support their claims. There are still hundreds of satisfied owners over on SHF.I'm not convinced its even a real issue. There's a group of individuals on SHF that have been dogging Rega for years not based on any actual experience or fact but totally on conjecture. No one on that thread has established the extent of the problem or even if it's an isolated incident and if there are more "defective" units out there.
I’ve never heard that, so I’ll take your word for it. I remember that Mars probe that smeared itself over the surface rather than landing - confusion over imperial vs metric measurements between US and EU contractors were cited as the problem. On the basis of what you say, I’m not in the least surprised.60 mil is US speak for 60 thousands of an inch or 0.06"
FWIW I think the issue was with American contractors, NASA work in metric.I’ve never heard that, so I’ll take your word for it. I remember that Mars probe that smeared itself over the surface rather than landing - confusion over imperial vs metric measurements between US and EU contractors were cited as the problem. On the basis of what you say, I’m not in the least surprised.
Hahaha I definitely am... I was two years old.To be fair, I’m a lot saggier than I was 35 years ago...