But it misses the point entirely of obeying the rules, it advocates the horrible culture of do what you like, pick the rules you want to follow and the others are for someone else. Modern society seems to have this running through it in many different ways.
I’m all for rules Paul, but there isn’t one here, the last UK vaccination Act was 1907 (just looked it up), which suggests such a rule is rather draconian(?).
As far as I can tell, the transmission to others is the same whether you have been vaccinated or not, so all it means is that vaccinated people stand a far greater chance of living after contracting COVID than those that do not - they’re simply playing a game of chance with their lives and not, in the main, affecting others while doing so, though I realise this is possibly too simplistic a statement to make, we do not know the ramifications at present.
I’ll have the vaccine and move on, safe(r) in the knowledge if/when I get the disease that I stand a very high chance of survival.
(Only this morning, a friend down the road (he works at a large local school) says he’s not having the vaccine, simply saying he’ll take his chances. Later on in the conversation he said maybe in a couple of years he’d have it once he knew it was safe. I think he’s misguided, but, like a lot of things in life, it’s up to individuals what they do, or do not do with their lives).