This goes to what I’ve called the exceptionalism that such headlines show to teachers.Teachers, you've been warned:
"Allison Pearson is away" is a nice touch.
Teachers, you've been warned:
"Allison Pearson is away" is a nice touch.
Hahahahhaha. The roles are reversed these days. Seriously, NEU is much less militant than the NASUWT. Which is good as it takes the heat off us.Yes. As an ex NASUWT rep I still keep my ear to the ground and there has been no talk from teachers or from within the Union about refusing to go back to work either.
But then in the NASUWT we’re so much more civilised that that bunch of militant Trots at the NEU
It’s not just that all the extra stuff that teachers do is taken for granted, it’s not even that it’s becoming expected more and more, it’s that teachers are still subject to thought processes like this that are as hateful as they are nonsensical.
As a teacher I regularly give up my whole lunchtime for revision/support. I do this about twice a week throughout the year. I do at least one after school session per week. I always put on sessions during the May half term and Easter. I do this out of choice. I don’t get any extra pay. . . .
Many of my colleagues do exactly the same.
I do not know a single teacher who has or is refusing to go back. I’m a Union Rep (NEU) and have had no teacher asking me for advice/concerns. The NEU has never said schools should not open.
Yes. As an ex NASUWT rep I still keep my ear to the ground and there has been no talk from teachers or from within the Union about refusing to go back to work either.
Hahahahhaha. The roles are reversed these days. Seriously, NEU is much less militant than the NASUWT. Which is good as it takes the heat off us.
That's to say, the more that management feel that can get away with demanding, the more they will demand. A headline like the one in The Telegraph isn't really about teachers not going back in September. That's not an issue. Its function is to keep the workforce insecure and isolated -- which helps to assure their continued compliance with management desires.
Yes. One of the problems that I faced more and more as an area rep, was the way that running after school clubs slowly crept into Performance Management assessments. What teachers now do voluntarily could easily become something with the potential to turn into a PM judgement that they’re failing in some wayI will add that there is no expectation from my Head to do this. I’ve always done it, along with running sports teams and taking kids away. However, there is now a greater expectation from parents and pressure from them to do it!
The Performance Management structure introduced by Gove has been described as a Bullies charter. It has the capacity within it to be used to increase teacher workload year on yearThat's to say, the more that management feel that can get away with demanding, the more they will demand. A headline like the one in The Telegraph isn't really about teachers not going back in September. That's not an issue. Its function is to keep the workforce insecure and isolated -- which helps to assure their continued compliance with management aims.
If teachers fall under the STPACD then the directing time budget would need to reallocated to ensure that any summer working did not exceed the 1265 hours limit, or teachers should be paid, or given time off in lieuWe discussed this as a governing body when it was first mooted. Well, when I say discussed it was more about agreeing how stupid it was.
Quite apart from the massive employment contract issues for the necessary support staff on term time only contracts, there was universal agreement that what was most inportant was having teachers ready to go next term given the challenges that will be there. Sacrificing that for more provision over summer was, understandably, seen as massively counterproductive.
Teachers have a moral and civil duty to educate our children, especially when the harm that the enforced absence is having on young minds is becoming painfully clear. And most are itching to get back to work.