standard said:The Office for Budget Responsibility has forecast that average earnings will fall by 7.3 per cent by the end of this year, only to rebound by 18.3 per cent in 2021, Bloomberg reports.
Compared with this year's artificially lowered wages due to lower furlough rates of pay rising back to "normal" levels.I just glanced at the headline in the FT this morning, I haven’t read the article and I haven’t thought about the details, but one thing caught my eye. It says that they’re expecting an big rise in average salaries over the next couple of years.
Compared with this year's artificially lowered wages due to lower furlough rates of pay rising back to "normal" levels.
https://www.ft.com/content/817ace46-2aa8-44b9-9b14-7035b5b0f718
I think that if the stats showed an anomalous jump in earnings, year on year, due to that effect, that would be a good, and fair, reason to suspend the triple-lock for a year or two. My guess is the Tories will instead use it as an excuse to abandon it entirely.Ah, thanks, that makes sense of it.
They recassified the state pension as a "benefit" some years ago in preparation for this sort of thing, so that really hiked up the numbers on benefits and the total cost of benefits.
Isn’t it odd, and rather depressing, that an ostensibly nice word like ‘benefit’ can be twisted so out of shape it becomes pejorative.They reclassified social security as benefits quite some time before that as that use of language is much more aggressive.
Can’t ‘like’ it, but totally agree.They'll not lose any support over it, they'll simply distract the population with someone else to hate instead.
a lot of older folks voted Tory over the triple lock