bit rude, but what should I expect from someone who draws conclusions based on nothing but prejudice
You are the one with prejudice, do you really want me to point out again where your problem is as clearly it passed you by last time?
bit rude, but what should I expect from someone who draws conclusions based on nothing but prejudice
Oh please doYou are the one with prejudice, do you really want me to point out again where your problem is as clearly it passed you by last time?
That's right. The Tories should ban all non-whites before they even think about joining.
Or could it be that in the Tories' party manifesto, there are a few other words written than just 'racism' ?
Oh please do
Yes, Really. If you have any evidence, let’s have it.Really? Did you not understand what I wrote last time? Nothing has changed.
Really? How very convenient for youI have been asked to drop the subject... so dropped I guess
I'd still love to know what's going on in Boris' head. He surely can't want to be associated with these ideas, so what's stopping him from saying so ?
I don’t know, dress it up in some bollocks pseudo-science about genetics and call it something like ‘visionary policy unorthodoxastics’ or possibly something involving the word imagineering.
Seems to have worked for Sabisky.
But, you have to wonder, why do we have to rebuff this shit in the 21st Century?
But, you have to wonder, why do we have to rebuff this shit in the 21st Century?
In the article, he praised Land, the philosopher and amphetamine enthusiast considered the founding father of the NRx movement.
Since we’re talking about tories and this has taken over the news, it has crossed my mind they could be getting upto something else right now they don’t want in the news. You always have to be suspicious.He has deleted his entire Twitter account now. Wonder if he “superforecasted” that one...
I hope this isn’t something more insidious, like Cummings testing the water for such views to be exposed.
Yes, if it looks like a dead cat, and it smells like a dead cat...Since we’re talking about tories and this has taken over the news, it has crossed my mind they could be something else right now they don’t want in the news. You always have to be suspicious.
Perhaps the whole of N°10's staff, including Boris, should sit down and listen to these short programmes broadcast on Radio 4 last week. I found them very thought-provoking:
How to Argue with a Racist: Adam Rutherford
https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/m000f5g4/episodes/player
As an aside, where do these bollocks self-important titles like "superforecaster" come from anyway? And what, or where is any evidence base for them?
It would be all be more straightforward if these people could cut to the chase and describe themselves as "twats".
Superforecasting: The Art and Science of Prediction is a book by Philip E. Tetlock and Dan Gardner released in 2015. It details findings from The Good Judgment Project.
The Economist reports that superforecasters are clever (with a good mental attitude), but not necessarily geniuses