Surely you are not referring to May's deal, a dead deal no one in parliament agree is worthy of the name, offering this as the original leave option is forcing remain as I said, no leave voter will vote for this.
This has all been said over the last 2 pages.
Because you are remain, you most probably think this is ok, it's manipulative from the get go & not what this country should be aiming for in the future IMO.
Again, in case you decided to pass earlier posts by, any lie offered by leave during the campaign could have been dismissed by remain, it was, on a regular basis, people had the option, no option with this pathetic deal put on the paper opposite leave. It will lead to a dark future if this government are allowed to do this in the name of remain.
No deal or no Brexit is where we are heading, as stated earlier, all the rest is idle speculation to fill up time.
To be honest I don''t really have much idea any more what all that means. I mean I can read the words and parse the text but it's such an obtuse jumble of thoughts and dark warnings that it doesn't lead me anywhere. I don't, for what it's worth, think this is your "fault" but I do think it reflects where we are with the debate. But I will attempt a reply which is, if nothing else, entirely sincere and said without malice or subterfuge of reference to other people's posts. I say that in the hope that should you want to reply you do me the courtesy of replying in the same way.
So strap yourself in this might, as is the want of these things, get longer than a usual post. It might also have some swearing although I don't think this is gratuitous as much as a reflection of the frustration I feel.
Firstly, my post about about leave voters getting a vote in any second referendum was just a straight reply to your point about a "faux referendum". To wit from a simple logical point of view it cannot be faux because everyone will get a vote. It is also, given the well documented flaws of the last referendum, hard to see how any second referendum could be any worse than the first one.
I think you can argue about sequencing, what the question is, etc. etc. but really a lot of that is just because to the complexity of the choice we face and the bluntness of a referendum. Indeed much of our problems stem from the insistence, almost exclusively from the leave camp, of treating a complex choice like a simple one. For two ****ing years and without even the merest sense of thinking that just maybe at some point it might be appropriate for people to pause, reflect on where we are and try to suggest someway we might move forward by changing their mind or just trying something different. In this sense the failings have, I think, been mostly political.
So I firmly believe that the answer to this is not to add another layer of partisan idiocy on top which is essentially what May and Corbyn have been doing. This is why so many people are so frustrated -- Corbyn and May are our leaders and their job is literally to sort stuff like this out. So far the only thing they have done is display how uniformly inadequate they are for the task.
I currently work in an environment where I am, by some distance, the least smart person in the room. What we do though is solve really, really, really ****ing hard problems. Or rather other people solve really, really, ****ing hard problems and I make myself busy doing the equivalent of making sure the bins are emptied. At the same time my mental faculties are in a sort of protracted terminal decline because of my age and my neurological condition. The thing is though even though I cannot really do my job anymore it's very obvious to me that this my place in the scheme of things. May and Corbyn in contrast seem both to completely lack insight into the banality of their own shitness and inadequacy for the roles they have found themselves in. This is why the nation collectively has its head in its hands. It's very obvious to everyone who, well, shit they are at as time of national crisis.
As to what we should do, I have said before that I think Parliament has failed and we should solve this with an A50 extension and some form of People's Assembly. I accept that none of that is straightforward but I do think it's the only way out of the absurd corner we have painted ourselves in. It will require much smarter people than me but also, I think, much smarter and better people than May and Corbyn.
Matthew
PS All the above is said with sincerity and if it sounds rude or condescending then please accept my unreserved apologies as this is not my intent. I find it increasinlgy hard to judge tone and spend a lot of my time being accidentally rude to people
PPS I recall the last time I attempted to write a post like this Joe H. punctured my pomposity with the Hutchian equivalent of a LOL. But at this point I don't know any other way to write this sort of thing than laboriously.