Seanm
pfm Member
He doesn’t consider them real people.Sorry if this sounds pompous but is a flippant post like that really needed when we're talking about the deaths of two children?
He doesn’t consider them real people.Sorry if this sounds pompous but is a flippant post like that really needed when we're talking about the deaths of two children?
Christ, you bunch of lefties
People would do well to read a good balance of news and comment more generally...
He doesn’t consider them real people.
Ageed, and also acknowledge wider, balanced and objective views regarding the whole circumstances? The violent disorder in wales following the fatal RTC is a case in point. Quick to attribute the issue to be the fault of the police, some offenders go and trash an unconnected, innocent residents motor(or 2).
The disorder is Wales will not be declared a riot by authorities, either. It was a violent disorder.
If you imagine highly personalised scenarios you'll imagine yourself into personal responsibility. The question of policing isn't personal though.If my daughter died riding an illegal vehicle on the streets that I'd provided for her guess what, the buck stops with me.
Ymmv
Let's see what comes out. If the police come out of it looking good, well. First time for everything.
I don't know what happened here but it looks like the police lied, as they always do, until they get caught on camera. That's on them. Looks like they've a history of over-policing local communities too, including running scooters off the road for LOLs.
This is not that different though, is it? It is certainly not unprecedented for some in the local community to respond to such situations by trashing their neighbours property and/or looting and burning local business.I think it's helpful to remember that the normal community reaction to a tragic event in that community is sympathy. Little knots of people gather and give each other comfort; piles of flowers, cards, teddy bears build up at the scene. That sort of thing. Not rioting, or 'violent disorder'. It's not 'jumping to conclusions' to ask why this one is different.
It is no more appropriate to automatically believe the Police than it is to automatically believe anyone else.I'm curious about the mindset of members who instinctively rush in to defend the police version of events in a situation like this. That forces are sometimes less than truthful is a matter of public record - just look at the police statements following the killing of Jean Charles de Menezes.
I'm not 'anti police' but where their statements are contradicted by witness statements or video footage I'm not sure it's sensible to automatically accept them at face value.
FWIW I can quite understand a fear of 'the mob' and a desire for law and order to be maintained. I value my safety and the security of my home. When there were riots in Camden in 2011 I found it extremely unsettling.
"Police Scotland chief says force is institutionally racist"
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-65706748
But again, I'd be looking for an underlying issue for which the event was an aggravating or triggering factor. It doesn't happen spontaneously, as a rule. Communities don't riot at the drop of a hat.This is not that different though, is it? It is certainly not unprecedented for some in the local community to respond to such situations by trashing their neighbours property and/or looting and burning local business.
If you know the recent history of 'disorder' in the UK (football and rightwing thuggery aside) it's always been the Police. Read Scarman, Macpherson - nothing's changed for the better because there's no political will to do so.
I’ve policed plenty of disorder situations, between 2985 and 2015, none of which were started by the police. Incl football, EDL and all sorts of other stuff. I fully acknowledge the instances you allude to, but your sweeping generalisations do your argument no favours from my POV.