I was in the same year as a number of children who were interfered with, bullied, parents bullied, teachers bullied etc etc. What happened then still happens - rarely thank goodness, but it happens.What is your experience?
I was in the same year as a number of children who were interfered with, bullied, parents bullied, teachers bullied etc etc. What happened then still happens - rarely thank goodness, but it happens.What is your experience?
I am sorry about your past experiences, I can’t even start to imagine how difficult that is, but I have had to deal with children who can.I was in the same year as a number of children who were interfered with, bullied, parents bullied, teachers bullied etc etc. What happened then still happens - rarely thank goodness, but it happens.
I was in the same year as a number of children who were interfered with, bullied, parents bullied, teachers bullied etc etc. What happened then still happens - rarely thank goodness, but it happens.
I've liked this but I certainly don't 'like' it. I sometimes see a guy popping up on Facebook and remember the terrible treatment he was subject to. It makes me sad because I can't believe he doesn't carry it with him now.Most of my teachers were good - just the one bad one. I reckon every pupil was rulered at least once (including the girls) and a couple of the boys slippered. We were just kids, from quite a nice part of the north east. He would carry out the punishments in front of the class and seemed to relish the theatre of it. He was religious and will almost certainly be dead by now and I hope rotting in hell.
I've liked this but I certainly don't 'like' it. I sometimes see a guy popping up on Facebook and remember the terrible treatment he was subject to. It makes me sad because I can't believe he doesn't carry it with him now.
Note to say that this teacher could have been a cub scout leader, doctor, community policeman, vicar - anyone who had trust of society and would be free to do as they pleased. It was just a shame that it was a teacher who had daily exposure to this lad (and many others).
My experience doesn't make me think all teachers are bad just as in the same way I don't believe all police officers in the Met are bad despite the recent press.
The ‘rotten apple’ theory has been comprehensively discredited by events of the last few years. Yet its adherents cling on tenaciously as they have no other explanation why the police behave as they do.Where are these voices? Why have they not been demanding change? Funnily enough the teachers' union magazine used to advertise canes bitd too. Today's report is a serious blight on the whole service
Rotten barrel...The ‘rotten apple’ theory has been comprehensively discredited by events of the last few years. Yet its adherents cling on tenaciously as they have no other explanation why the police behave as they do.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-shropshire-64989418
Yes. My experience as a caseworker for a union is the same. Fact of the matter is that in my profession a Gross Misconduct allegation would be the end of a members career even after being found not guilty.I was a shop steward for 30 years. In that time I can’t remember a single person who kept their job after ‘Gross Misconduct’ charges were substantiated. Feckin’ outrageous.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-shropshire-64989418
The court would have been a criminal charge, with the attendant standard of proof. It’s not unusual for behaviour to be gross misconduct, but not to stray into criminal territory. The court case comes first, so any disciplinary findings don’t prejudice the jury.Hard to understand keeping a job after gross misconduct, but I’m equally struggling with her having been found not guilty by a jury, and then guilty of gross misconduct. How does that work ?
The court would have been a criminal charge, with the attendant standard of proof. It’s not unusual for behaviour to be gross misconduct, but not to stray into criminal territory. The court case comes first, so any disciplinary findings don’t prejudice the jury.
It’s for the court, and jury to decide, not the CPS. The CPS decides if there is enough of a prima facie case with evidence to put before the court, but doesn’t presume guilt.Indeed. But I’m this case the behaviour did ‘stray into criminal territory.’ It strayed so far that the CPS authorised charges, and there were two trials.