What all digital playback systems, including CD, streaming and downloading, do to the original recording is what a jigsaw puzzle does to a picture. No matter how fine the pieces, it cannot be a perfect nor even a near-perfect facsimile of the original.
Think he a fan of quad? Cool..I think Kessler lost the plot years ago.
It's a pity though, I used to enjoy reading his articles.
Taping hi res onto reel to reel..then playing it back through reel to reel into hifi beats all newcomers in my golden eared opinion..The old analogue v digital. Well let’s face it the older recordings were recorded on reel to reel and then mastered on reel to reel before eventually making it onto vinyl. I would hope they would sound better! His point was that as far as consumers are concerned the only available format is vinyl. I just find my turntable gathering dust unless I want to show it off to some poor unexpecting visitor.
Ridiculously good for beer money? Then compare that ' Ridiculously good ' against reel to reel taped from qobuz hi res...now that's proper Ridiculously good..in my golden eared opinion..It's a lifestyle-y bumpf piece in a magazine for people who like mechanical watches i.e. consumers who likely have a preference for older technologies. He's sensibly writing for his targeted audience.
I thought his points about physical media were interesting. The only point I'd disagree with is that it costs a lot to get digital right compared with vinyl. Pi based streamers can sound ridiculously good for beer money.
Digital sounds great but does it sound esp musical?''digital processing hacks music into bits and reassembles it''
Can't argue with this.
Good digital can sound musical but I prefer AAA. Despite of that, I'm spoiled by the convenience of digital + having millions of dollars worth of music for a small monthly subscription...Digital sounds great but does it sound esp musical?
Ridiculously good for beer money? Then compare that ' Ridiculously good ' against reel to reel taped from qobuz hi res...now that's proper Ridiculously good..in my golden eared opinion..
Me too..I like the convenience of qobuz straight into my schiit eitr then into dac..then into pre amp then into amp then onto speakers with various cables joining them! Mmmm...so convenient!Good digital can sound musical but I prefer AAA. Despite of that, I'm spoiled by the convenience of digital + having millions of dollars worth of music for a small monthly subscription...
Yes good point...my mate got his teac for £350 the spools can cost upwards of £20 each pre loved...but....big but! It sounds amazing..taped hi res on reel to reel..cassette isn't too shabby either..most of my listening is qobuz..so easy to do..so cheap..all that high quality sound..so cheap..I can well believe it. I like tape saturation. Sadly not many serviced high quality R2R decks to be had for £50 which was my point re streaming vs vinyl.
I spose, but TBH it would be more surprising if someone who has been writing crap for decades suddenly betrayed any understanding.It’s surprising that someone who’s been in the business as long as Ken still doesn’t understand digital.
It’s surprising that someone who’s been in the business as long as Ken still doesn’t understand digital.
It’s fine if people aren’t interested in what’s going on but annoying when when an audio journalist is furthering misunderstanding.
Was the reel-to-reel a good one? Had the heads ever been cleaned? What dac was used from streamer to reel-to-reel? Was the tape used good enough quality? And most importantly what amp and what speakers? Was it van damme it cables used? Too many variables...Having taken part in an unsighted format test back in November, I actually thought hi-res streaming sounded better than the R2R of the same recordings. And I assumed the streamer was the R2R and the R2R was the streamer!!!
YMMV