TheDecameron
Unicorns fart glitter.
Cop out. Don't vote for corruption.Put a party and policies forward which people will vote for. Can’t be too difficult, can it? Actually, it should be a piece of cake right now.
Cop out. Don't vote for corruption.Put a party and policies forward which people will vote for. Can’t be too difficult, can it? Actually, it should be a piece of cake right now.
Cop out. Don't vote for corruption.
The only uncertainty with that statement would be the size of the Tory majority; even the Tory haters on pfm would not vote for Labour.The biggest issue we have is lack of credible and effective opposition. The govt can get away with virtually anything. Despite all the shenanigans, I’m certain if there was a GE tomorrow, the majorly would be 100+.
Does that mean that you consider the Tories the least worst option?That would mean never voting. We’re very much in a least worst option scenario.
Caroline Slocock, who founded the Civil Exchange thinktank and was private secretary to Margaret Thatcher, told the Guardian she had “quite significant concerns” that the focus on Hancock’s breach of Covid rules had “let him off the hook” for “potentially an abuse of public money”.
She claimed there had been a “murky series of events” and that, given Coladangelo worked as a communications director, “it’s quite hard to see” how she was qualified to advise DHSC on its central policy areas of health and social care.
Slocock said Hancock had “at best, essentially appointed an old chum”, and added: “To get your mistress to be marking your homework is not acceptable.”
Yes, but it’s worse than that insofar as Hancock was advised to use government emails in order to be in line with government guidelines and to allow proper scrutiny. The question is, if Hancock was actively avoiding scrutiny, what was he trying to conceal?'If you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to fear' is the line that has been used to excuse successive invasions of our privacy.
'If you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to fear' is the line that has been used to excuse successive invasions of our privacy.
Ironically it is confirmed on the internet that Matt Hancock forbids his three children to use social media.
They took the smoke detector/spy cam off and a dead cat fell out? His human rights have been breached- maybe he can go to the ECHR..Interesting to see how the whole issue is being shifted by the Tory/right to one of security, i.e. the positioning of the camera. To recap: gross incompetence that kills tens of thousands = fine. Government corruption and tax theft to the tune of £bns = fine. Whistleblowing = not fine.
The only crime is getting caught, which may always have been the Tory mantra.Interesting to see how the whole issue is being shifted by the Tory/right to one of security, i.e. the positioning of the camera. To recap: gross incompetence that kills tens of thousands = fine. Government corruption and tax theft to the tune of £bns = fine. Whistleblowing = not fine.
The only crime is getting caught, which may always have been the Tory mantra.
Aren’t they four of the Rees-Mogg kids?That’s “deprehensum crimen tantum questus” in Tory according to Google Translate.
Aren’t they four of the Rees-Mogg kids?