My disagreement is not about the Labour Party, but the significance of the anti woke movement.
Individual expressions of antiwokery, such as the Mail Headlines, might seem unimportant on their own, but that add up to a culture of aggressive intolerance and the propagation of lies.
I agree that Labour has positioned itself onto a place where it’s incapable of action, it seems incapable of taking a stand on anything at a macro level and even when it opposes government on specific things, it can only criticise on a micro level and those criticisms are quickly forgotten, but that is their problem.
On a larger level the Tories are winning hands down and the vehicle they are now using to drive their advantage forward, to create a society divided on social and racial justice, is antiwokery. Soon they will have their own TV station headed by Andrew Neil with an explicit antiwoke agenda. This is an agenda to attack those who are pro social and racial justice. This is an agenda to preserve a myth of our national greatness. This is an agenda to prevent any discussion about our history that does not fit the myth.
This agenda is an attempt to drive any discussion of social or racial justice into a cul de sac surrounded by Tory ideologues.
We have seen evidence that groups of Tory MPs are attempting to create a movement that rewrites history, not least from
@oldius about a worker for the National Trust being harangued by complains for providing historical context.
Rewriting history is not insignificant, it’s the tool of tyrants