TheDecameron
Unicorns fart glitter.
Arrest the plotters.
Hang Ted Heath.
Hang Ted Heath.
“There is no question of Britain losing essential sovereignty.”
Ted Heath, Government White Paper, 1971.
Nothing happened to change the balance of those sovereignty issues in the intervening 11 years?“I must emphasise that in my view the surrenders of sovereignty involved are serious ones, and I think that, as a matter of practical politics, it will not be easy to persuade Parliament or the British public to accept them."
“I am sure that it would be a great mistake to underestimate the force of the objections to them. But these objections should be brought out into the open now because, if we attempt to gloss over them at this stage, those who are opposed to the whole idea of joining the Community will certainly seize on them with more damaging effect later on”.
Lord Kilmuir, Lord Chancellor, in response to a letter from Heath in 1960.
“I must emphasise that in my view the surrenders of sovereignty involved are serious ones, and I think that, as a matter of practical politics, it will not be easy to persuade Parliament or the British public to accept them."
“I am sure that it would be a great mistake to underestimate the force of the objections to them. But these objections should be brought out into the open now because, if we attempt to gloss over them at this stage, those who are opposed to the whole idea of joining the Community will certainly seize on them with more damaging effect later on”.
Lord Kilmuir, Lord Chancellor, in response to a letter from Heath in 1960.
Indeed. Why on earth are we harking back to 1960? The world has changed and we have moved on. There ha ve been inventions, including applications for an amazing electronic device called a transistor.That does seem to be the era where that belongs. Post Imperial and pre-globalisation. It’s almost as if the world is the same as 1960 and what went before it. Are there any other political and economic areas of life where you recommend we adopt fifties attitudes?
If only the world hadn’t moved on.
Nothing happened to change the balance of those sovereignty issues in the intervening 11 years?
That does seem to be the era where that belongs...
...If only the world hadn’t moved on.
You could be talking of the European project. Conceived in the 1950s as a response to issues of the 1930s and 40s.
Yeah. Like the British one- conceived in 1702-3 in response to issues of the late 1600s. Now well past its shelf life.You could be talking of the European project. Conceived in the 1950s as a response to issues of the 1930s and 40s.
Well, that's arguable, depending on your threshold for (gag) "essential" sovereignty. Certainly doesn't look essential at the moment.“There is no question of Britain losing essential sovereignty.”
Ted Heath, Government White Paper, 1971.
The key word there is "essential".“There is no question of Britain losing essential sovereignty.”
Ted Heath, Government White Paper, 1971.
“There is no question of Britain losing essential sovereignty.”
Ted Heath, Government White Paper, 1971.
The key word there is "essential".
As has been said by many before, any international agreement involves giving up some sovereignty.
Why not go the whole sealion and just demand a positive of brexit?In real terms - what 'essential' sovereignty was lost, and has since been regained ?
If only the EU had negotiated in good faith, agreed a mutually beneficial deal and given up on the punishment beating.Apart from those for whom Brexit has been a catastrophe - like the many small businesses who did significant export business with the EU.
So where was the Brexit backlash in the local elections?
Either the majority of the voting public feel Brexit was a success, which most on here deny almost daily, or they just don't care.
It's probably the latter IMO. The arrival of a worldwide pandemic has set everything in context. People will just be happy to get back to some kind of normality.
If only the EU had negotiated in good faith, agreed a mutually beneficial deal and given up on the punishment beating.
If only the EU had negotiated in good faith, agreed a mutually beneficial deal and given up on the punishment beating.