Cereal Killer
432
Wonder how this works when a repair has to be done on an EU item ?I'll sum it up in one word.
******!
Wonder how this works when a repair has to be done on an EU item ?I'll sum it up in one word.
******!
Wonder how this works when a repair has to be done on an EU item ?
Wonder how this works when a repair has to be done on an EU item ?
It really is personal
Just listen & look
for me personally
Build quality . Luxman / Accuphase. Then Yamaha
Looks. Yamaha/ Luxman. Then Accuphase
VFM. Yamaha. Luxman. Accuphase
ur money ur choice
All three are excellent
I was wondering, or what happens when someone is moving house? Surely they don't have to pay VAT (again most likely) on stuff they already own? Or what about students studying abroad and then returning to the UK ?
The Luxman is Class AB too, it only has a higher class A part.I suspect a lot of that will be the difference between class A and AB.
Based in Ireland, I have over the years purchased various kit from the UK. Sad to think those days are over.Again, all these scenarios are well practiced and regulations in place, if you do some research. These have always applied to destinations outside the EU, which now includes the UK. People are beginning to realise just what an impact leaving the EU has had/will have, on all sorts of things.
I'm not having this argument with you again.The Luxman is Class AB too, it only has a higher class A part.
I think he’s correct though. My L590AX-II is 30w class A but apparently can go beyond that to about 90w in A/B. Academic to me as I rarely venture beyond the first watt into my 93dB Tannoys!I'm not having this argument with you again.
There is no need for arguing, it is a fact.I'm not having this argument with you again.
Some do, some don't. Which is why the rated class-A output is relevant, as most class-A amps will switch to class-AB operation at maximum output. I'm reminded of my Musical Fidelity A-100. There is no way that amp produces 50WPC in class A given its minimal heatsinking. I suspect it's class A for maybe the first 10W, and class AB beyond that.Couldn't you use that rationale to call any class AB amp class A? I guess some manufacturers already do this, and it seems like false advertising.
Academic perhaps, but whether an amplifier is "pure" class A or not, if its specified class A output is delivered in class A, then it is a class A. If it switches to class AB beyond that, that's bonus headroom. I'd rather have an "impure" class A amp that does this, than one that clips beyond its rated class A output.
I expect the Lux 590 to be operating in class A up to 30WPC into 8-ohms. All the non-switching benefits will be realised if this output level is not exceeded. So to all intents and purposes, the 590 is a class A amp at its rated output, if not its maximum output.
I don't think you can use weight as a reliable indicator. Mark Levinson tends to be overbuilt.No way a 62lbs. stereo integrated amp is 30w Class A. What is pure Class A is a 25w 65lbs. mono Mark Levinson amplifier.
The Sugden A21 SE weighs 15kg and is a class A amplifier AFAIK.No way a 62lbs. stereo integrated amp is 30w Class A. What is pure Class A is a 25w 65lbs. mono Mark Levinson amplifier.
It is, but people claim "it is because it is a class A amplifier" and then the discussion starts because it isn't. IMO (including what I'm writing) if someone writes things that are technically wrong, the claim has to be corrected because otherwise the wrong information is repeated and manifest and that can't be the goal. Hifi still is and always will be technical based.It’s totally irrelevant to me, the amp either sounds good or it doesn’t.