Tony L
Administrator
We've been here before, he's the leader of the largest(by a huge margin) opposition party. Typical Lib enabling tactic is to suggest an alternative no one would entertain.
The only proposed situation was a VoNC with Corbyn as interim leader. This means no Tory who plans to stand at the next election would ever vote for it as it basically spells the end of their careers. So, we need to look at Tories who are seriously anti-Brexit *and* are either stepping down or being deselected. To my knowledge that is Ken Clarke and Dominic Grieve. The Tory/DUP majority is one, so with these we are at minus one. Against that figure you have people on the Labour/non-Tory side who have said they either won’t vote for Corbyn or won’t vote to stop Brexit, so counter with say Soubry, Leslie, Hoey, Mann etc etc. The numbers were never there.
If however the same thing could be achieved without the ‘treachery’ and absolute career destruction of voting for a “far left” Labour government and framed more as a simple policy scenario, which is all the LDs have really been arguing for, then there might be 30 Tories in play.
Turn the tables; exact same scenario rotated 180 degrees... how many Labour MPs would vote against their own party for a Tory government led by say Johnson or IDS? My money is on close to zero. Main party politics is remarkably tribal and career oriented. It is insane/delusional not to factor this in, and Labour didn’t.
The LDs were exactly right to call bullshit and try to persuade people that a more viable and potentially winnable solution be tabled.