a.palfreyman
pfm Member
There are two main changes from NCC200 to 220:
1) Quasi > fully complementary o/p stage
2) Change of R2 from 22K to 1K
The effect of #2 is not that subtle, it cleans up the sound and makes it sound less "dense" i.e. less of the Naim sound.
I would hazard a guess that this makes more difference to the sound than the changes to the o/p stages.
@Joppe - you could try linking/shorting R2 on your NCC200 boards and have a listen.
@S-Man - No, definitely not; I've long said look at the effect of the large R2, model it, and realise what it contributes to 'naimness' by imposing a definite, shall we say, harmonic profile on the output? If that's what you want, that's mostly how it is done! Move away from that and logically you are into finessing a classic 3-stage, LTP/VAS/OPS, Class aB amplifier much like any other.
(To me - like most things audio - beyond a certain competent minimum, it's mostly about personal aesthetic choice more than much else: and that is what DIY is for)
ETA: do I have to point-out that in such a DIY context, unfortunately the choice of what is 'competent' also tends to become somewhat subjective? That's likely a separate debate, entirely!
Totally agree Martin.
I have listened to the R2 effect, back and forth, quite a few times. It's an interesting subjective effect.
Setting R2 to to 22K (or 7.5K in a NAP200) gives a more dense sound which can be quite appealing. I have found I can listen to new music at modest levels all day (e.g. Radio Paradise) on these type of amps, due to some sort of tune-enhancement (or simplication?). On a more neutral amp there is more variation to the sound from one track to another, with some stuff sounding worse, but most sounding better. The really telling test is when you wind the wick up a bit and the denseness of the sound becomes tiresome.
Maybe this is why owned and sold NCC200s twice. I should have tried the R2 mod on them!
Having read these comments in the Qudos thread I decided to try the variation 2) and put 2k7 across the 22k resistor that feeds TR2 of the LTP of my NCC200s (giving as near as dammit 2k4). First hour sounded very bright (but have experienced this before so knew what to expect) and it settled down over the next few hours. There seems less "projection" in a 3D sense, but this is more natural and there was definitely a change in the tonal balance. Following day, played for several hours and found several benefits, pretty much as described above. I had been having problems with a lack of focus in the centre of the image (particularly with trumpet left and sax right which could tend to 'merge' in the middle of the image) and this was now much better. Instruments sound more natural and the soundstaging (particularly depth) seems more natural: piano notes on the right-hand could appear to 'jump-out' at you but not after this mod. I found though that some frequencies seem reduced in output so I can agree with the description of a "tuning" effect with the 22k in place. Will be giving this some time to see if my ears settle with this because to me the improvements far outweigh the negatives.
Made some rudimentary measurements:
Before mod: 1k (TR1 feed) has 0.54Vdc across it and 22k (TR2 feed) has 10.1Vdc across it indicating a standing current of 0.54mA and 0.46mA respectively.
After mod: 1k (TR1 feed) has 0.52Vdc across it and 2k4 (TR2 feed) has 1.15Vdc across it indicating a standing current of 0.52mA and 0.48mA respectively.
Could this "rebalancing" of the collector currents have an effect on the sound? I don't know enough about electronics to answer that. The only other thing I can think of is the ratio of 22k on TR2 and 27k feed-back resistor. These have an almost exact ration of 9:11 so could this be causing a tuning effect where notes of a similar ratio played simultaneously "affect" each other?
Best,
AP
Forgot to mention this had no vast effect on the bias current or the DC offset on the output