JohnW
pfm member
Ian
The SHARC DSP's are at the mercy of the code implemented on them - so they will be as good or as bad as the software code.
IIRC the SRC is block is built into the SHARC DSP's they dont need to be enabled, but I believe MiniDSP operate at a fixed sampling frequency (upsample or downsample) everything to 96KHz (atleast of there HDMI box) to avoid having to calculate different DSP filter coefficients for each sampling rate.
I'm afraid its a case of MiniDSP not believing that the ASRC is so detrimental to the sound quality...
DSP's are easy, its the software ecosystem around them that's difficult and MiniDSP has a an extensive software ecosystem. However, without being able to avoid the ASRC I'm not sure how much we can improve the SQ - for sure having better DAC's is a good thing, but the ASRC will remain the most severe bottle neck.
The SHARC DSP's are at the mercy of the code implemented on them - so they will be as good or as bad as the software code.
IIRC the SRC is block is built into the SHARC DSP's they dont need to be enabled, but I believe MiniDSP operate at a fixed sampling frequency (upsample or downsample) everything to 96KHz (atleast of there HDMI box) to avoid having to calculate different DSP filter coefficients for each sampling rate.
I'm afraid its a case of MiniDSP not believing that the ASRC is so detrimental to the sound quality...
DSP's are easy, its the software ecosystem around them that's difficult and MiniDSP has a an extensive software ecosystem. However, without being able to avoid the ASRC I'm not sure how much we can improve the SQ - for sure having better DAC's is a good thing, but the ASRC will remain the most severe bottle neck.