Not brutal at all, I drove one once around a track in Italy and it was almost disappointingly easy. Computers control the brakes, the differential and traction. You just press a button to change up or down. I think you can disable a lot of that stuff and it might be more fun. But certainly less "brutal" than my old 1987 Porsche 911, although with much more power.
Exactly. These are wonderful cars to drive in the dry, you can't really go wrong, but with 500hp as soon as those rear wheels light up in the wet you've lost it, and the first time this happens on a motorway you'll just back off and momentum would spin you round. I feel sorry for him/her!!
I drive an M5 which has similar power. It's a doddle to drive, even erm....quite rapidly.
These cars have traction control and lots of gizmo's to keep them drivable and safe. How he could write one off on the M1 which is hardly a challenging drive I have no idea, except perhaps he switched all the safety guff off, in which case he is a ****-nugget and deserves everything he got.
Well the way my mate drove it certainly gave the impression it was, I held on tight. I've owned properly brutal cars my TVR griff being a good example, very scary for 320ish BHP.
And Scuderia means stable.
Oh dear
In the sense of a racing stable ... as in Scuderia Ferrari.
And Scuderia means stable.
Oh dear
I somehow doubt the owner went from having a basic thing like a Mondeo straight to a 430 Scuderia!
You normally progress towards such a car via lots of other fast/sports cars, so I'd say it's unlikely to be driver error due to inexperience.
I suppose once you get the hang of it, you can drive it brutally, given the massive power. All the electronic safety and ease-of-driving features won't alter the laws of physics. My feeling was mainly that it could be easily driven by someone who did not know how to drive very well. In the sense of no brutal clutch or heavy brakes, no sudden surges in power, hard but gentle suspension. But I only did 3 circuits with it.