I might be in the minority, but having both the 282/250 and the 202/200, I seem to prefer the 202/200. I wonder what kind of 'setup' issues I'm running into - or are there other folks out there how have the same sort of preference?
were you running these bare or with a Hicap?
If you prefer it it's better, end of.
I might be in the minority, but having both the 282/250 and the 202/200, I seem to prefer the 202/200. I wonder what kind of 'setup' issues I'm running into - or are there other folks out there how have the same sort of preference?
@dave: who's your dealer?
Something wrong there, went from 202/200 to 282/200 and never looked back. maybe the 250 is a wrong'un.
I think Dave was a dealer, have a quick look up his sleeve for there lurks confirmation by way of the cloven hoof.
I suspect its the speakers and room that are the bottleneck. My domestic situation doesn't allow for the system to be plot into brain and Brawn at this point either.
In any case, I'm happy enough with my current setup, and should be able to sell of the 282/250 at little or no loss.
The 282/250 adds a ton of bass information to the mix - I suspect the room needs more treatment to handle that.
The 202/200 sound is very clean sounding. I've ran a SN-1 for a few months, but was never too happy with it - all with a Hicap dr and same source.
Also, with the 282/200 - I feel the 200 isn't passing all the info through.