1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.
  2. Where we are now: The site is back up and running! The character set encoding issue has been fixed so old posts should now look ok. I am currently working on themes/skins etc and I will be deleting the temporary green skin very soon as it has many issues. I will do a very quick variation on the stock blue skin first just to get a light-grey background and san-serif font, and I will set this as default. Later this week I will hopefully add a professional third-party skin in pfm colours (life is way too short to do this crap myself, and I've found one I really like than needs next to no tweaking). We are getting there slowly...
    Dismiss Notice
  3. May I please request people check and update their email address if it is out if date. I ask as I’m getting countless bounce errors as the server fails to send notifications through etc. I’ll eventually figure out how to send these to a black hole somewhere, but it makes sense to address it at source as quite a few folk are obviously not getting the thread and conversations notifications they have set in their preferences.
    Dismiss Notice
  4. Things you need to know about the new ‘Conversations’ PM system:

    a) DO NOT REPLY TO THE NOTIFICATION EMAIL! I get them, not the intended recipient. I get a lot of them and I do not want them! It is just a notification, log into the site and reply from there.

    b) To delete old conversations use the ‘Leave conversation’ option. This is just delete by another name.
    Dismiss Notice

Wheres me damn 35mm!

Discussion in 'photo' started by garyi, Mar 28, 2006.

  1. Joe P

    Joe P certified Buffologist / mod

    Gary,

    Shoot both lenses at f/8 to f/11 -- no out-of-focus elements, no bokeh to fret about.

    Joe
     
  2. matthewr

    matthewr spɹɐʍʞɔɐq spɹoɔǝɹ ɹnoʎ sʎɐld

    Vuk's approach to photgraphy has always been more than somewhat "painterly" so his bad bokeh experience makes perfect sense to me -- its not hard to imagine how a painting can be completely ruined by a small but obvious daub of the wrong colour in the wrong place for exmaple.

    Having said that, I do think Vuk's advice is not the most appropriate for Gary. If you must do a music analogy then Gary would be reading Bert Wheedon's "A Tune a Day" and Vuk would be Dave Gilmour ctelling him he needs to learn this really subtle hammer on pull off double string bend technique and slip it in somewhere around the 8min mark of his second solo and the 20 min alobum closing track.

    Also this allows uis to compare Vuk to Fat Dave Gilmour whihc is amusing in it's own right :)

    Matthew
     
  3. Greg

    Greg 2t5b

    It's essential to own a LC-A IMO.
     
  4. garyi

    garyi leave blank

    Would this bad bokeh be indicative of the particular lenses I have picked up? Or have I picked up some dodgy ones?

    Its no matter, I am pleased with them and have come to accept that I am just a 'dabbler' these lenses seem appropriate. Once I am able to picture pretty naked women and urban downtown scenes then perhaps I'll look at something else.

    Sigh.
     
  5. Joe Hutch

    Joe Hutch Can you hear Talvin Singh?

    I can picture the former without a camera of any sort!
     
  6. garyi

    garyi leave blank

    hehe, yes indeed.

    I must admit the whole thing is pretty overwhelming, its hard to know how you could produce an interesting shot without feeling its all been done before.
     
  7. guybat

    guybat [+]

    Your lenses are absolutely fine iGary. Bokeh is a relatively specialised feature, relevant only when you're using wide apertures (f/1.8 or 2.0 on yours) and using very specific focusing techniques. Like Joe said, stick the aperture on f/8 and it's a non-issue - pretty much everything's in focus anyway.

    I use f/11 all the time with my Nikon 24mm lens, and keep focus manually on about 2 metres. That way, everything from about 1 metre to infinity is in focus, which is entirely appropriate for the way and what I shoot:

    http://guybatey.com/photographs_1.htm

    If you get seriously into low-light (or available light) portraiture, you may start to think about how the background can blur pleasingly, but it's really not an issue at the moment.

    Someone who uses wonderfully subtle portrait lighting is the Observer's Jane Bown. She's used an Olympus OM-1 and a 50mm f/1.8 lens with available light only for over 40 years, normally stuck on f/2.8 and 125th. Look at:

    http://observer.guardian.co.uk/review/page/0,11821,1009693,00.html

    Click on the Flash link.
     
  8. Joe Hutch

    Joe Hutch Can you hear Talvin Singh?

    My earliest efforts with a 'proper' camera were B&W shots of abandoned churches/chapels in Mid-Wales. No-one else would be sad enough to photograph them! I also took some panoramic shots of London from Greenwich Park, which have historic interest because they were taken just before Canary Wharf was built. I never bothered my head about any of this 'bokeh' malarkey either.
     
  9. auric

    auric pfm Member

    garyi,
    I bet their are not too many photo competitions that have 'bokeh' as a category heading so why bother entering those as I'm sure Vuk will win them all without too much trouble. You concentrate on other categories and just keep clicking away at whatever catches your eye.
     
  10. michaelab

    michaelab desafinado

    But the painting clearly isn't completely ruined if all the people who see it think it's "the most maginficent thing they had ever seen".

    Michael.
     
  11. vuk

    vuk \o/ choose anarchy

    i think most of you are failing to understand. in my failed picture, 80% of the shot is out-of-focus, so bokeh becomes a very dominant element, not just one or two "bum notes" in a song. the entire balance of the shot and its visual impact rely on it. instead of something smooth, delicate and flowing, i got busy angular fuzz that dominates the shot.

    i think what may be throwing people off is that i pointed to just one small area in gary's 35mm pics as an example. the was just to pin-point ONE "objective" characteristic. the entire photo is not ruined by the poor performance of the lens, although it isn't helped either. in the 50mm shot of the barbed wired, the entire background is simply atrocious, but the deails are so small it would be difficult to dissect the details for purposes of illustration.

    as for tony's comments about how lack of sharpness, blur and distortion can produce nifty artistic effects. i agree! bad bokeh, however, is simply (and always) annoying.

    vuk.
     
  12. garyi

    garyi leave blank

    I had another go around the area, the problem is not so pronounced around a setting aperture 11 so I think using it in A mode may help in these circumstances.
     
  13. garyi

    garyi leave blank

    I wonder as well if having the camera set to 'sharpen' is not helping matters. I'll switch that off.
     
  14. vuk

    vuk \o/ choose anarchy

    igary.

    you should turn off ALL enhancements the camera does in-house and fiddle only with photoshop. next, you sould have the thing set the "M" mode. otehrwise, i will be right over to confiscate it.

    being forced to use a lens at f/11 is absurd, IMO. see my new thread for an alternative.

    vuk.
     
  15. garyi

    garyi leave blank

    I do use M mostly to be fair P mode seems to screw everything up usually. I only use P if its an over in a flash situation.
     
  16. vuk

    vuk \o/ choose anarchy

    do you have a proper light meter?

    [​IMG]
    (not my photo)

    vuk.
     
  17. guybat

    guybat [+]

  18. vuk

    vuk \o/ choose anarchy

    well, then she does use a light meter. the shitty one inside her camera

    jane brown doesn't even know how to hold a camera properly:

    [​IMG]

    regardless, relected light reading will ALWAYS be inferior to incident readings. there is no debate here: one measures the real thing, the other measures an approximation of it.

    vuk.
     
  19. palpnorte

    palpnorte leaf, heem strong ...

    garyi - for inspiration, do a Google on Wolfgang Tillmans and then click on images and have a look through - see what you think.

    He's managed an impressive career capturing the very very ordinary, but in an interesting and quite original way, and for someone that feels that great photographic subjects don't come their way, he may be a help. Good books available from Taschen & the Tate.

    Socks rolled up on a sofa, a bunch of keys in the back of a door , a pair of jeans on the end of the stairs - not to mention pics of food!!. Sometimes, he actually even manages to come close to a different way of seeing, by being able to dodge outside the western conventions of composition and what makes a picture 'good' - which is a very difficult thing to do, especially if you've had any sort of art training, which presumably he has. Also, I don't think he would know what bokeh was if it bit him on the bum.

    You don't have to do the knob pics though.

    I wouldn't mean to condescend for a minute, but I do think that the quality of your pictures has really come on since you first began posting them on the Naim forum a couple of years ago. I particularly liked the one that comes up as 'tree50' if you check properties, in this thread. Lovely light, and open to all sorts of poncy interpretations.


    palp
     
  20. vuk

    vuk \o/ choose anarchy

    here's the first picture of his i found:

    [​IMG]
    TITLE: Alex with cock plant, 1992

    i think it's crap.

    vuk.
     

Share This Page