Thanks Amar - this road sign is in a village not far from our place, and driving past it I promised myself to pop back with the camera.
Pen vs X100F? This has been an itch to scratch for a long time now, in fact bar picking up a 100F at the recent LCE Photo Show in Lincoln, I'd put it off for fear of receiving open wallet surgery (again!)
I really like the F (what's not to like tbh?) and it feels just great - the very subtle additional girth to house the bigger battery is a welcome aspect and makes the F feel more solid as a result. I had a brief walk a few yards up and down the street outside the shop and popped off a few very informal shots. Also took a few indoors under artificial light. Sure, the Fuji's larger sensor is going to give more headroom in terms of low light/high ISO but the Pen claws that back with the amazing IBIS - because of this, I don't think I've had to go over 800 since I got the camera 8 months ago.
To keep a level playing field, I shot jpegs on both cameras for comparison (still have the RAW files though) and was very surprised to see the Pen F match the Fuji - or at least so close to be insignificant. The Pen gives a sharper image too - what ever anyone says, the X100's lens is soft wide open. Only once down at f4 does it really gain some bite - for example the little Panny 20 is sharper at 1.7 than the Fuji is at f4. This gives the Pen a couple of stops' advantage, a shallower DoF and just as much ability in low light where ISO can be kept low.
The 100F's desirability is - for me anyway - still off the scale though. I'm convinced Fuji coat them with magic 'buy me' dust.