1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.
  2. Where we are now: The site is back up and running! The character set encoding issue has been fixed so old posts should now look ok. I am currently working on themes/skins etc and I will be deleting the temporary green skin very soon as it has many issues. I will do a very quick variation on the stock blue skin first just to get a light-grey background and san-serif font, and I will set this as default. Later this week I will hopefully add a professional third-party skin in pfm colours (life is way too short to do this crap myself, and I've found one I really like than needs next to no tweaking). We are getting there slowly...
    Dismiss Notice
  3. May I please request people check and update their email address if it is out if date. I ask as I’m getting countless bounce errors as the server fails to send notifications through etc. I’ll eventually figure out how to send these to a black hole somewhere, but it makes sense to address it at source as quite a few folk are obviously not getting the thread and conversations notifications they have set in their preferences.
    Dismiss Notice
  4. Things you need to know about the new ‘Conversations’ PM system:

    a) DO NOT REPLY TO THE NOTIFICATION EMAIL! I get them, not the intended recipient. I get a lot of them and I do not want them! It is just a notification, log into the site and reply from there.

    b) To delete old conversations use the ‘Leave conversation’ option. This is just delete by another name.
    Dismiss Notice

Mods to Naim CDS3

Discussion in 'd.i.y.' started by rontoolsie, May 14, 2006.

  1. Jo Sharp

    Jo Sharp Pulls on doors marked push

    IIRC they were 30H...and around £300
     
  2. James

    James Lord of the Erg\o/s

    Just to piggy-back this question, how are tants used on Naim amps? As coupling caps, bypass caps or something else?

    James
     
  3. martin clark

    martin clark pinko bodger

    (James - both for coupling and bypass, i.e. decoupling).

    Tant caps for all their folklore faults have one very, very nice feature: the ESR - often an ohm or so - dominates the response. This means that rails decoupled using tants will rarely 'ring' - the stable ESR provides very useful damping well above audio and into the HF (because the cap intrincially is pretty low-inductance). And nicely-damped things rarely display unwanted overshoot or 'ringing' as can easily be provoked for example by unthinking exchange for film caps (with very low-ESR)

    I suggest if one wants something that might contribute to 'a sense of musical timing' it surely includes 'good time-domain response'...
     
  4. john.luckins

    john.luckins pfm Member

    A suitable series (or parallel) resistor will damp the ringing of any capacitor, including a film cap. Now you don't see that being done very often, but it would allow them to be used say in the load or bypass of a 3 terminal variable regulator such as a LM317. Film caps can be wound or stacked to ensure low inductance as well, though at a price.

    I wonder how a properly damped low inductance film cap would stand up sonically to a Tantalum in the Tantalums optimum environment? I suspect it will be both non polar and more linear and thus be technically better. Its time domain response could be made to be the equal of the Tantalum, but would it actually sound better? I know it would be much more expensive.

    I believe that Tants are very good value for money in the right places just as Naim use them, but even there they are not the very best possible solution, just the easiest.

    John
     
  5. James

    James Lord of the Erg\o/s

    Thanks, Martin.

    How might the substitution of film caps with tants at the input and/or output of my active crossover change the sound?

    James
     
  6. martin clark

    martin clark pinko bodger

    I use a small-value series R a lot. Adding parallel R would usually imply horrific power dissipation for the same effect. (Thevenin doesn't care, so might as well save the power)

    I do this because I prefer the result to tants - and it'll never need replacing ;). Appropriate values of R are easily calculated if you know or can measure, even guess the equivalent inductance you are working with:
    (LM317 example )
     
  7. trancera

    trancera pfm Member

    James,

    Does your pre amp have an output cap? If so the best input cap on the XO might be a piece of resistor offcut ? Carl seemed keen on this on input caps to power amps for example.

    Should be able to easily measure any DC to check.

    Brian
     
  8. James

    James Lord of the Erg\o/s

    I suspect not, as I once noticed a glitch when I measured DC going into my loudspeakers, and traced it back to the preamp output. That 'fault' could not be replicated since. By that measure, I also suspect that one of my amplifiers is DC coupled (otherwise, how would it have amplified DC) but the other pair probably has input caps.

    I have retained coupling caps at both ends of my AXO, just so that if the fault should recur, at least my amps and loudspeakers are protected. Perhaps I could remove the input coupling caps, but I'm most keen to retain the output caps.

    James
     
  9. trancera

    trancera pfm Member

    Ah I see. Thread trashing but IME different caps can change the sound quite markedly. Films going from bright to just perfect. There is something in those there tants and maybe just might suit you. (I like how you are being dragged into the electronics more ;))
     
  10. James

    James Lord of the Erg\o/s

    Since building my first active XO, I have little choice. ;)

    It's also much easier to tweak an AXO than a PXO. I just want to know I haven't compromised the 'quality' of upstream signal with second rate mid-stream componentry.

    I can't remember the values of the coupling caps, but it should be a simple matter of swapping them out to hear the difference(s) first hand.

    James
     
  11. martin clark

    martin clark pinko bodger

    Working into highish impedance, like coupling caps in an AXO are, will be much less sensitive than passives in a PXO. If it sounds good.. it is :)
     
  12. rontoolsie

    rontoolsie pfm Member

    With the chokes located between the rectifiers and the main filter caps, there is no measureable (within two decimal points) change of the voltage either going into or coming out of the voltage regulators. What however does changes is the amount of measured ripple coming out from the voltage regulators (down to about one tenth of the original) and the spectrum of the ripple. These measurements have been done both without and with load (i.e. with the CDS3 hooked up).

    As you suggest, having ringing at a value much less than 1Hz is of no consequence. The ripple spectum seems to be 120Hz and harmonics.

    A much more important calculation is that the choke offers an impedence of over 10,000 ohm to 120Hz ripple, yet only about 0.25 ohm to the DC it does transmit.


     
  13. john.luckins

    john.luckins pfm Member

    That's good news on the regulator voltages Ron. I still can't get my head round how you achieved such a high inductance for such a low DC resistance. I fancy giving this a try myself on my preamp supply. I've had some success with a low value choke already. How did you find someone with the required expertees and what were the specifications? Maybe there are such people over this side of the pond?

    John
     
  14. rontoolsie

    rontoolsie pfm Member

    I was in contact with the lead design engineer in the largest inductor/choke factory in the world. With the specs I provided- Henry value, physical size and DC resistance- they said it couldn't be done. But the guy who did all these CDS3 mods had some interesting ideas. The prototype he built had a measurable DC resistance of 0.23 ohms, a value greater than his meter could read (30 Henries maximum) and would carry 10A plus continuous. The design is very proprietary and comes heavily encapsulated not only to provide screening and insulation, but to discourage curious eyes as to what lies inside.

    I have had these 'wonder chokes' installed into XPS2s (three of them), a 555PS, three NAP500PS, two 552PS and an Epona SPS power supply going to a Prefix. The results in each case has been very large subjective and objective improvements.

    Each choke requires several hours of hands on machining time, with additional time spent potting it (the external assembly is some plumbing accessory made from PVC and is good insulation to many kilovolts). The cost is appropriately high given the assembly time and the fact that no other chokes of even remotely similar specs can be had anywhere for any price.

    The problem with other high value chokes is their inordinate high DC resistance (which in some power supply designs is not a terrible thing, and can add another degree of noise rejection) but more importantly their inability to pass more than a few mA of current, and therefore cannot be used between the rectifiers and the filter caps- where they seem to work the best.

    Also deliberately putting these high Henry chokes in places with high current draw guarantees a very high additional energy storage, which typically exceeds the number of Joules the filter caps are storing. Think about it, the Joule value is 0.5 current (maybe 1-2 amps) times the value in Henries^2. At least in the case of the CDS3 where the head unit is pulling large amounts of current.

    A commercially available Hammond choke for instance in a 30H value has a DC resistance of almost 600 ohms and a current rating of only 40mA. Entirely inappropriate to be used where I have had these chokes placed.
     
  15. Juhleren

    Juhleren New Member

    Dear Ron and all other contributers,

    Very interesting reading this thread!
    I´m planning on making some XPS´s for naim CDP´s and came across this thread in search for the experiences out there, and have been very taken by the reports on the effects of the chokes mentioned.

    Has anyone tried jensen or DNM four pole caps, and care to report their experieces on the audible effects of these type of caps?
    -Would it make sense to apply chokes before this type of caps, as their construction means separation of input and output terminals detaching the feed from the source by the film in the caps?

    When I first read the stuff about the special chokes, I first thought Ron ment 30 to 40 mH as these numbers seem to be what can be found elsewhere (at greater sizes and/or slightly higher DCR, though). Can it really be that these chokes offer around 1000X what other coil types can do and keep such low DCR figures and smallish sizes? I´m really not doubting the effect of these devices, but if the specs are as claimed, they would potentionally revolutionise the coil industry, as for instance my donut shaped 8.2 mH coils on my woofer is around 4-5 inches in diameter and still only offering around 0.1-0.12 ohm DCR and not being entirely cheap either...

    Any comments would be greatly appreciated.

    all the best,
    Juhleren
     
  16. rontoolsie

    rontoolsie pfm Member

    Juhleren...trust me-these chokes are at LEAST 30 Henries (not mH)...the inductance meter on the DVM tops out at 30H...and these chokes are in excess of them. How much-who knows..50, 80H or even higher. I guess I could hook up 3 or 4 in parallel and then see what the reading is and multiply that by 3 (or 4) for the correct value. What I do know is that the ripple is greatly reduced (100x or more going into the filter caps and 10x or more coming out of the voltage regulators) with very low but measurable DCR. And as I mentioned before the chokes are situated between the rectifiers and the filter caps, and before the voltage regulator boards.


    I too ended up with an 8.2mH tape foil inductor in my after market DBL crossover, made by Alphacore...and it was the size as you described-as wide as a saucer and weighing in at over a kilogram or three, with a cost of circa $120 USD. BTW Jensen now offer toroid inductors of that value with a DCR of less than 0.01 ohm. This potentially can greatly increase the damping factor of your speaker, and indeed in the DBL allowed for a quicker tighter bass with these in situ as compared to the Alphacore one with 20x the DCR.

    As far as the main filter caps go...the standard BHC/Aerovox have been replaced by much physically smaller ones with the same nominal value but with lower ESR (Nichicon I believe) with the amount of capacitance for the digital feed doubled over the original.
     
  17. rontoolsie

    rontoolsie pfm Member

    Wow...6 years since any mods were done to the CDS3. Anyway-one of the modded units after ten years needed a new transport. Fortunately I had purchased the last ten VAM 1250 transports when NANA dissolved, so I have a few to spare.

    This seemed like a great opportunity to effect some additional mods. There are four PROMISIC CO31 caps, two of which seem to be right after the DAC.
    You can see them here
    [​IMG]
    So.....
    Out with the old
    [​IMG]

    And in with the new
    [​IMG]

    The replacement caps are oil-filled 47uF and are bypassed with some much smaller value Cardas caps.

    Results-Much more expressive, articulate and extended bass and pitch accuracy. For control there was an otherwise identical CDS3 side by side, that had all the mods except these latest cap replacement ones.

    Next round will be to replace all 52 resistors in the signal path with equivalent value tantalum ones.
     
  18. Yomanze

    Yomanze pfm Member

    Just chucking in 'premium' resistors like tantalums isn't a good idea IMO - sure you can change the flavour, but different resistors can work better in different areas, and a lot of the time for a much cheaper price.
     
  19. rontoolsie

    rontoolsie pfm Member

    I should also mention that the four 47uF caps measured closer to 25uF...which surely would cause bandwidth limiting as well as phase anomalies around their cut-off point. Both of which would significantly contribute to lowered performance. Also, it looks like all the previous images are no longer available. Eventually, I will reupload them to a current image hosting site and restore all the lost images.
     
  20. rontoolsie

    rontoolsie pfm Member

    The Naim resistors are specced as 1% tolerance (see diagram below). But based on upgrading resistors in other Naim products-the Superline for instance-there are great potential improvements out there.

    Here is the circuit the analog portion of CDS3-showing exactly where these resistors could be upgraded and the values of them.
    [​IMG]
     

Share This Page