advertisement


Journalism or public relations?

Yes. you did read that wrongly.

We need small new companies coming to the market. They frequently cannot afford to advertise. If there are not enough advertisers in the magazine, the magazine dies. The advertisers effectively act as patrons, but in the process require review space in return. We also have to pay tribute (more or less) to those brands that are sanctified by the Audiophile Gods, but don't advertise (Linn and Rega for example) and what's currently en vogue with our international enthusiasts. What's left after that goes to discovery brands.
So (to adapt the famous saying about newspaper editors) the role of the hifi mag editor is to publish as many nice things about his advertisers as his readership will allow.
 
Much to my surprise, we do seem to have reached a position where hard-pressed audio journalists feel compelled to act as unofficial PR people for 'the industry.'For me, as a hard-news journalist all my working life (mainly in broadcasting, but I spent ten years on newspapers) that seems an utterly disastrous point to reach.
'Disastrous' because the inevitable result is to leave us 'punters' without proper representation in the audio press.The voices (actually, better described as demands) from the industry, take precedent over the paying public, whose hard-earned cash is the only thing between the audio industry and utter oblivion.
Alan Sircom has been very honest, and given up quite a lot of his time, unpaid.I hope he prospers, and he has risen in my estimation. But, sadly, it doesn't seem to change the basic point. the audio press is just a mouthpiece for commerce.
What profound error.
 
What does audio reviewing have to do with journalism? I know arguments about audio here and elsewhere can get heated, but our kerfuffles over bit depth and the merits of expensive wire (or not) are rather far removed from, say, war correspondence, as but one example of real journalism.

Hope Chomsky has been alerted.

Joe
 
He went to Choice last year as editor.
Has he now left Choice too?

To quote David's Twitter entry for 2nd February:

"After ten years editing hi-fi magazines, I am moving on to pastures new. It's been fun, thanks for the memories!"

:(
 
But, sadly, it doesn't seem to change the basic point. the audio press is just a mouthpiece for commerce.
What profound error.

One could make that accusation about the audio / music press since it's inception. To my mind it doesn't prevent it's usefulness at all, as it, the punter, manufacturer, and now online communities such as this one all form part of the same circle. I don't see it as something with sides, it's just a development, production, marketing, communications and feedback mechanism that should benefit all parties. Far better viewed as a loop / circle than battle-lines! We are all on the same side!
 
I'd like to give Alan some credit for being so frank with us.

What's next after the demise of the audio press as we know it?

Well my friends we are back where we all started so many years ago with the music and our home stereo's. The only difference between now and then is that we are all hopefully a little bit smarter and possibly have better taste in music. Nothing stays the same, our hobby will mature and evolve.

From Sunny Alberta

Louballoo
 
Lou,

Well my friends we are back where we all started so many years ago with the music and our home stereo's.
Yes, people en masse will ditch their big-screen TVs, Nintendos, computers, iPads and iPods for two-channel kit they build with their bare hands.

Joe
 
One could make that accusation about the audio / music press since it's inception. To my mind it doesn't prevent it's usefulness at all, as it, the punter, manufacturer, and now online communities such as this one all form part of the same circle. I don't see it as something with sides, it's just a development, production, marketing, communications and feedback mechanism that should benefit all parties. Far better viewed as a loop / circle than battle-lines!

Tony,
The battle is over. The audio press as we knew it is nothing more than a quivering carcass gasping its last breath. Just us audiophiles, the internet and a couple of journals left.

Your Pal

Louballoo
 
Lou,

Joe, at least in my case, I would give up my PC, TV and all other electronics before my stereo.
Most would give up a dedicated stereo long before giving up the PC, TV and other electronics. This is precisely why audio is in decline, and it has nothing to do with foo or audio magazines.

Joe
 
Yes, people en masse will ditch their big-screen TVs, Nintendos, computers, iPads and iPods for two-channel kit they build with their bare hands.

That's the problem. Way back, hifi magazines were dedicated mostly to 'how to build amplifiers/loudspeakers/other stuff' articles, lots of technical information and long, mostly classical music reviews. Then, in the late 1970s, a new type of magazine arrived, full of 'aspirational' equipment, often with scantily-clad young women posing around them, subjective reviews of 'what stuff sounds like' and shorter, rock-based music reviews. The two types of magazines co-existed happily for a while, with very different readerships.

Now, with fewer mags and a smaller reader base, the surviving mags are going to piss off one group or other by publishing reviews of stuff that's 'too cheap' or 'too expensive', by having too much, or not enough, technical guff, or by not catering to the readers' taste in music.
 
One could make that accusation about the audio / music press since it's inception. To my mind it doesn't prevent it's usefulness at all, as it, the punter, manufacturer, and now online communities such as this one all form part of the same circle. I don't see it as something with sides, it's just a development, production, marketing, communications and feedback mechanism that should benefit all parties. Far better viewed as a loop / circle than battle-lines! We are all on the same side!

Yes, but are we the wagon train or the encircling Indians?
 
Joe,

...scantily-clad young women posing around them.
I know what you're saying. We need to bring back that levitating and staid receiver bloke.

b56jcfr4kcs0qozjk.jpg


Joe
 
I love the way Receiver Man is able to sit 8" above the seat. I'm going to spend the evening practicing that one. Gravity is in for a taunting tonight...
 
I love the way Receiver Man is able to sit 8" above the seat. I'm going to spend the evening practicing that one. Gravity is in for a taunting tonight...

He's clearly levering himself up on the stack of receivers. You can tell by the way his arse has pushed the pillar several feet into the ground.
 


advertisement


Back
Top