Colonel_Mad
pfm Member
I'm just unbelievably picky in this regard to the extent I'll actually photograph artwork myself if need be, e.g. if the copy I have ripped is a MoFi, Japanese first press or whatever that is the artwork I want!
Glad it's not just me. Apple just don't cater for or have any interest in music for any other reason that they can make money out of it.
All my ID3 and Artwork data has been meticulously curated over nearly 20 years since I first discovered Napster and the fact I could set my work computer to the task of downloading music rather than the data crunching it was meant to be doing.
It perhaps shouldn't be, but it is something that is really important to me and as it turned out to my health too. It was a genuinely stressful experience to see that work destroyed in the course of an hour or so after clicking the icloud switch to 'on'. I was really worried it would start to transfer back to the music on my hard drive.
I assume somewhere in the small print of those long documents Apple get you to agree to from time to time that we've all agreed to let apple destroy our chosen ID3 information in the interests of conforming with their world view.
There are stories online of rare tracks being replaced by the standard release versions of Greatest Hits albums (the artwork perfectionist's bete noir) and explicit songs being replaced by censored versions when people have made my mistake in the past. Hopefully I've avoided that.