See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blinded_experiment for examples in physics, social sciences, forensics etc. But I am not sure where else the validity of blind tests is so much disputed or avoided.
We don't. Subjective testing is super important; however when it comes to assessing the impact of a system change this must be done blind for reliable results. I am not sure why uniquely in audio blind tests are rejected when they serve everywhere else - except perhaps wine tasting :-)
Couple of reasons. One is that if outlandish statements are not challenged some may believe there is a consensus in agreement. Two is that cable nonsense has damaged the industry/hobby to my mind so I would like to see it tamed.
I heard this attributed to Harold Wilson, former prime minister, but no idea really:
Reporter: Why do you answer every question with a question?
Wilson: Do I?
I am not sure technically if limited and non-flat frequency response counts as distortion but I include that of course. Some distortion is more audible than others for sure but it is all important in the quest for high fidelity. I would be interested in your references for "Distortion has been...
It's a matter of where the distortion is. Transducers distort much more than other hi-fi components. There is some logic in source-first especially for record players because the record player is also relatively high distortion. Amplifiers are low distortion as are digital sources making the...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.