So far, I like the Saru bloke. He reminds me a bit of that three-armed/legged bloke from the cartoon.
So far, I like the Saru bloke. He reminds me a bit of that three-armed/legged bloke from the cartoon.
Joe
he's good too, but even saying that i feel like i'm encouraging grown men to play with capitalist consumer dolls.
we really need a new sci-fi show, nit this marketing department rehash of a banal formula. why isn't money-driven "innovation" giving us something better? i just don;t understand.
vuk.
.
So, the question is, has the quality of films deteriorated because of larger audiences (lowest common denominator/keeping the customer satisfied), or are the two entirely separate and unrelated phenomena? Is there a sufficiently large paying audience for more mentally stimulating material, or are re-hashes of stuff from their childhood all that will hold the interest of a mass audience?
Thought episode 4 was much better. Proper Trek.
Cruelty to intelligent beings.
Stupid plot devices (spore drive? What?)
Ships in atmospheres (arrgh!)
Tech shown beyond any previous series.
... what Trek were you thinking of?
Stephen
Avidly would be all at once!
I don't hate itbut it's not Trek for me (so far).
If it wasn't called Trek it would be seen on the level of Dark Matter or Killjoys. Entertaining but not essential.
Stephen
Has there been a more stupid idea than the spore drive in Trek?
Fair enough.
Probably not, if we're talking about story elements
Spock's brain?
Stephen
i keep forgetting to watch it.
Has there been a more stupid idea than the spore drive in Trek?
Stephen