Did you read the Supreme Court judgement? Particularly the dissent.
Whether she won or not was irrelevant, Parliament was bound to act as it has done. So the case was a colossal waste of time and money.
The only explanation for her bringing the case was the hope that Parliament, which largely disagreed with the referendum result, would act to inhibit or reverse the implementation. (Which demonstrates a failure to comprehend the constitution and where sovereignty starts)
Hence either Miller was attempting to reverse the result, or she is a complete idiot. Mull is wrong as I don't think she's an idiot.
Paul
Bereft of argument, the remainers flounder in childish nonsense; it was ever thus.
The idea that Mull or Jay are somehow more knowledgeable on our constitution than JR-M is most amusing.
The idea that Mull or Jay are somehow more knowledgeable on our constitution than JR-M is most amusing.
Perhaps they'd care to enlighten us on which part of the premise that the repeal of the European Communities Act of 1972 will restore parliamentary sovereignty to Westminster is incorrect?
If that wasn't her aim then she is spectacularly stupid.
In any case her case (!) demonstrated a marked incomprehension of the constitution. An incomprehension that appears widespread.
(We've been over it literally times, so I see no point in reiterating)
Paul
.
I've read some offensive shit on here from time to time but that above is way beyond the pale.
You using the word spastic is outrageous and you should be ashamed of yourself.
For what it's worth I voted remain and fully support Gina miller.
Suggest you re-aquaint yourself with the term spastic when directed at an object, idea or notion rather than a person or people. No shame required.
The word 'spastic' as an adjective can only be applied to humans or animals.
You using the word spastic is outrageous and you should be ashamed of yourself.
For what it's worth I voted remain and fully support Gina miller.
Your use of the word shame is outrageous. Reconsider your choice to be publicly triggered by language.
No better I'm afraid. For some guidance see http://www.dictionary.com/browse/cretinousThen it's withdrawn, substitute cretinous.
There are no horrible words, only horrible people. You are labeling SteveS1 as being horrible, or at least horribly careless. I think that's a mistake on your part.
No better I'm afraid. For some guidance see http://www.dictionary.com/browse/cretinous